Getting Divorced: Know Your Options When It Comes to Selling the Family Home




marital propertyDividing marital property?  Know Your Options:

When getting divorced, determining what to do with the marital property can be difficult.  As you figure out the most favorable way to divide assets, be sure to look at your primaryhome and other marital property within the big picture – as part of the whole – and try to detach your emotions from the decision-making process.

When handling your divorce and marital property division, it may be in your best interest to split the equity in the home.  If so, it is important to understand the pros and cons of the various approaches to splitting equity when getting divorced.

Before fighting to keep the family home, make sure you have taken all the costs to keep and maintain the home into account.  Remember, you will need to be able to pay these costs both during the marital property division process and after getting divorced.

If you decide to sell the marital property and split the net proceeds, you will benefit from dividing the assets right away and by getting the greatest capital gains exclusions.  On the other hand, in a down economy, the home may be upside down with negative equity, which means you may have to take a loss or even bring money to the closing table.

Another option is to refinance and pay your spouse with proceeds from cashing out some of the equity in the marital property .  If you choose to do this, you can benefit from dividing the funds right now and can take advantage of low interest rates.  Unfortunately, it may be difficult to qualify for refinancing with only one income, while using both incomes further complicate matters.

You might also choose to use other assets, such as cash, investments, or retirement funds to “buy them out.”  This could be a viable option if you really want to stay in the home, but cannot qualify for refinancing.  But remember that the assets you cash in may actually hold more value than the marital property and you may not be able to liquidate the assets again if you need them.

A final option, if you cannot qualify to refinance and one spouse wants to stay in the marital property , is a promissory note, which allows time to pay.  There are some problems that come along with agreeing to a promissory note, however.  For example, if the owing spouse files for bankruptcy, the other may not collect what is owed.  Also, if there is a lien on the home of the owing spouse and they lose it in foreclosure, this marital property would no longer act as collateral for the balance owed on the note.  And finally, this option keeps one spouse acting as a debtor over the other – not usually a good situation after getting divorced.

To help you make an informed decision for your particular case, consult someone with experience in financial matters and divorce, such as a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA).  It is important to get the best support available so you can negotiate a favorable outcome for your divorce.

Marital property division, including splitting equity, requires the specified knowledge of a trained professional



Get Information on the New Credit Card Rules




Here is a good synopsis of the new Credit Rules that went into effect this week from the Federal Reserve.  http://tinyurl.com/new-credit-card-rules.  I have been blogging about the need for these reforms for some time now.  They are a step in the right direction, though the credit card companies were given a long head start to give many folks the shaft before the changes came.

Pay particular attention to the example given in the "How Long Will it Take to Pay off Your Balance" section.  Minimum payments will keep you indebted to the credit card companies for much of your life. 

Best bet, use your credit cards wisely… only for emergencies or if you know you can pay off the balance every month.  That way you can avoid the credit card crunch and pay yourself.  Just imagine what those minimum payments could be worth to you in retirement if you were able to invest that money for your future rather then having to pay it towards debt! 



Government Assistance for Homeowners is a Farce!




I wrote this email today to a reporter at the NY Times regarding his story that came out today and my experiences with my clients in regards to the govt. assistance programs mentioned in it.  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/business/15housing.html?th&emc=th  My email to him below.

_______________________________________________________________________

Mr. Streitfeld,

I am writing regarding your article today, U.S. Housing Aid Winds Down, and Cities Worry.  I saw that you made reference to the home owner assistance programs through the government.  I wanted to share with you my experience in dealing with these agencies and lenders.

I am a CDFA (Certified Divorce Financial Analyst) and I have been trying to help several clients navigate the murky waters of divorce in a down real estate market.  

When the government announced the home owner assistance programs I was very excited to be able to offer a ray of hope for those buried under the debt of fallen housing values.  What I have found instead is a front and a farce with these programs.

Because the lenders can choose whether or not to participate these measures have no teeth.  I have yet to find one lender who is willing to participate and in my conversations with other professionals that deal with the same matters we are all finding the same thing – little to no participation from the lenders or servicers of the loans.

In essence, it appears that the homeowners have been offered hope, but really there is nothing behind the curtain when it is pulled back. The HUD counselors have no authority to make anything happen either.

I have called my Senators offices, Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) and emailed the White House several times about this to no avail.  Not one of them has returned my phone calls or emails.

No one in the media is talking about this as I don’t believe many are aware.  I am trying to get the conversation going because I truly believe that the institutions that were bailed out when they needed help are now stalling in the hopes that the programs will simply run out of time before anyone realizes what is going on.

Please do a follow-up story on this as families are losing their homes while the stalling game is played.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Lisa C. Decker, CDFA
www.DivorceMoneyMatters.com

________________________________________________________________________

I would love to hear your experiences with any of the government sponsored home owner assistance programs – HAMP,  HARP, H4H and their newest HAFA.  Please leave some comments below.  And be sure to contact your Congressmen, Senators and the White House to keep the pressure on to help the taxpayers who bailed out the big banks when they needed it!



Banks to Bailout Government?




From the Center for media and Democracy weekly ezine 9-23-09

Banks to Bailout Government?
Source: New York Times, September 21, 2009

Steve Labaton of the New York Times reported that senior regulators at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are seriously considering a plan to have the nation’s "healthy banks" loan money to the government to replenish the FDIC insurance fund that protects bank depositors. The fund, which has been tapped to protect deposits in close to 100 failed banks, is rapidly running out of money. Generally federal agencies are wary of using funding mechanisms that might give the appearance that they have been "captured" by the very institutions they are charged with regulating. But apparently FDIC chair Sheila Bair would rather pursue this cockeyed strategy than ask sparring partner — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner — for a government check. Not surprisingly, banks welcomed this development with open arms. The Independent Community Bankers of America’s Karen Thomas claimed, "Borrowing from healthy banks instead of the Treasury has the advantage of keeping this in the family. It is much better for perceptions than having the fund borrow from someone else." If the banksters really think we are all one great big family, perhaps they’ll start giving consumers a break on 27% credit card interest rates.

 

Is this a set up or just a bad movie?  What will they conjure up next!  ~Lisa



TechOSS Website Development and Website Design Services - 973954402